nanog mailing list archives

Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment


From: "Lancheng Qin" <qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 14:40:14 +0800 (GMT+08:00)

Hello, we have done a worldwide measurement to identify which ASes have propagated RPKI-invalid prefixes. We find an 
interesting phenomenon that some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., provider 
interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces). Although there are other studies [1, 2] noting the same 
phenomenon, little is known about why some network operators perform different filtering policies at different 
interfaces.


We are trying to figure out the reasons and summarize the optimal deployment policy for RPKI-invalid filtering. To this 
end, we create an anonymous questionnaire and hope you can help fill out it.


Questionnaire link: 
https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/previewId/70bbaf01-b4a6-4f7d-aac4-33cff5b135a3/SV_dj62hVBXcEy5ryC?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current


Reference:
[1] Help Validate ROV Adoption Measurements from RoVista. 
https://labs.ripe.net/author/tijay-chung/help-validate-rov-adoption-measurements-from-rovista/
[2] 85% of MANRS Members Conformant to Actions 1 and 4. https://www.manrs.org/2023/01/85-of-manrs-members-conformant/


If you have any questions, concerns, issues, or comments, please send an email to qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn


Best,
Lancheng


Current thread: