nanog mailing list archives

Re: CUPS in a BNG?


From: Tom Mitchell <tmitchell () netelastic com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:53:23 -0700

What is it about the architecture that makes it a preferred solution.  I
get that centralizing the user databases makes sense, but why the control
plane.  What benefit does that have?

-- Tom


On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 2:17 PM <brian.johnson () netgeek us> wrote:

The CUPS makes a lot of sense for this application. Latency is dependent
on the design, and equipment used. I’ve seen/done several designs for this
using two different vendors equipment and two different BNG software stacks.

When I do a design for BNG from scratch, this is how I do it now. :)

As always… YMMV.

- Brian

On Mar 22, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Tom Mitchell <tmitchell () netelastic com>
wrote:

Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing?  I have a customer asking,
but it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the
DP and CP make this a really dumb idea.  Has anyone tried it?  Does it make
any sense?

Thanks!




Current thread: