nanog mailing list archives
Re: About emails impersonating Path Network
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 12:41:43 -0800
This seems like a perfect object lesson on why you should use DKIM and SPF and make sure the sending domain can set up a p=reject policy for DMARC.
Mike On 2/6/23 10:25 AM, Konrad Zemek wrote:
Hi Nanog, It looks like someone with an axe to grind against our company has decided to email every AS contact they could find on PeeringDB, impersonating us and sometimes spoofing our domains. We're aware of the emails and are sorry for the inconvenience. We've since added SPF records to the domains we own but don't use (the perps have since name-squatted some new ones). We're also actively working with law enforcement on the matter. Thanks Konrad Zemek CTO Path Network AS396998
Current thread:
- About emails impersonating Path Network Konrad Zemek (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Jay Hennigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)