nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior...
From: Lincoln Dale <ltd () interlink com au>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 14:40:13 +1100
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 7:09 PM Christopher Hawker <chris () thesysadmin au> wrote:
How big would a network need to get, in order to come close to exhausing RFC1918 address space? There are a total of 17,891,328 IP addresses between the 10/8 prefix, 172.16/12 space and 192.168/16 space. If one was to allocate 10 addresses to each host, that means it would require 1,789,132 hosts to exhaust the space.
See 30 minute mark of https://youtu.be/ARlBHmPy7Zc?t=1787. We talked about this in a NANOG88 presentation too but had a bigger timeslot to talk at AusNOG so we said a bit more about it.
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior..., (continued)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Mike Lyon (Dec 09)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 10)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Jon Lewis (Dec 10)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Mike Lyon (Dec 09)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Sabri Berisha (Dec 09)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Christopher Hawker (Dec 10)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... William Herrin (Dec 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Giorgio Bonfiglio via NANOG (Dec 10)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 10)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Sabri Berisha (Dec 11)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... owen--- via NANOG (Dec 11)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Christopher Hawker (Dec 10)
- Re: Interesting Ali Express web server behavior... Lincoln Dale (Dec 11)