nanog mailing list archives
Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 19:47:38 -0800
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 5:04 PM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> wrote:
What I've found missing were references to packet loss impact on performance. It seems to assume cable/fiber environments with little to no packet loss, while Wi-Fi and 3G/4G/5G are not like that.
Wireless environments tend to do L2 retransmission, so they express packet loss as jitter (random change in latency) instead of actual loss. If you're seeing loss, it's generally on a wired segment. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds, (continued)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds sronan (Dec 01)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds William Herrin (Dec 02)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds Tom Samplonius (Dec 01)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds Dave Taht (Dec 02)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds Tom Beecher (Dec 01)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds sronan (Dec 01)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds Mike Hammett (Dec 01)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds Stephen Satchell (Dec 01)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds Dave Taht (Dec 02)
- Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds William Herrin (Dec 02)