Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211210951.AYC

[Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>]

Quite simply, expecting the vast amount of legacy ipv4-only equipment out
there in the world that is 10, 15, 20 years old to magically become
compatible with the use of 240/4 in the global routing table is a non
viable solution. It is not a financial reality for many small to medium
sized ISPs in lower income countries.

The amount of time and effort that would be required to implement your
proposal is much better spent on ipv6 implementation and various forms of
improved cgnat.

Trying to extend the use of ipv4 space resources for a few more years is
directly analogous to building sand castles on the beach when the tide is
obviously coming in.




On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 07:29, Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com> wrote:

> Dear Eric:
>
> 0) Your opinion by itself is very valid and much appreciate. However, it
> is from a very remotely related perspective. That is, you are looking at
> the financial disadvantage of the less developed regions. What I am
> talking about is the generic issue of communication system address
> management that applies across the board. This subject is normally
> designed by system planners. The result is given to the product
> development engineers who usually do not have enough knowledge to
> question it.
>
> 1)  The IPv4 address pool depletion issue was caused by the poor
> "resources management" concepts. In this case, the insistence on the
> Internet addressing should be flat (instead of hierarchical) led to the
> quick depletion of the finite sized 32-bit pool. The fact is that the
> current prevalent CDN (Content Delivery Network) business model based on
> CG-NAT configuration is a clear hierarchical network, anyway. All what
> EzIP proposes is to make it explicit and universal for improving the
> performance.
>
> 2)  To create a viable hierarchical network with depleted address pool
> like IPv4 was practically an impossible task. Fortunately, the 240/4
> netblock is available because it was "reserved for future use" ever
> since 1981-09, yet no clear application cases could be found. So, this
> is a natural resources that will benefit everyone without reference to
> financial status, although the developing regions can benefit more by
> utilizing it to leap frog out of the current disadvantaged situations.
>
> Hope this explanation makes sense to you.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Abe (2022-11-21 10:29 EST)
>
>
>
>
> On 2022-11-20 17:56, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> > If I had a dollar for every person who has lived their entire life in
> > a high-income western country (US, Canada, western Europe, etc) and
> > has zero personal experience in developing-nation telecom/ISP
> > operations and their unique operational requirements, yet thinks
> > they've qualified to offer an opinion on it...
> >
> > People should go look at some of the WISPs in the Philippines for an
> > example of ISPs building last and middle mile infrastructure on
> > extremely limited budgets. Or really just about anywhere else where
> > the residential broadband market has households where the entire
> > household monthly income is the equivalent of $500 USD.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 04:59, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     On 11/19/22 05:50, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
> >
> >     > Dear Owen:
> >     >
> >     > 1) "... Africa ... They don’t really have a lot of alternatives.
> >     ...":
> >     > Actually, there is, simple and in plain sight. Please have a
> >     look at
> >     > the below IETF Draft:
> >
> >     It's most amusing, to me, how Africa needs to be told how to be...
> >
> >     Some folk just can't help themselves.
> >
> >     Mark.
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com