nanog mailing list archives

Re: Scanning the Internet for Vulnerabilities


From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg () tristatelogic com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 23:53:46 -0700

In message <7c5f9d80-8686-07bb-b6ed-6e41fa1e1bee () si6networks com>, 
Fernando Gont <fgont () si6networks com> wrote:

Note: What's most usually done out there is scanning for ports, rather 
than for vulnerabilities.

Yes, and at least some of the responses in this thread have not, I think,
noted this rather important distinction.

For my part I intended to ask specifically about attitudes towards scanning
for actual vulnerabilities, e.g. those that have been assigned CVE numbers.

Depending on who is doing it, and why, my personal feeling is that even
here in 2022 this should still be viewed as being exceptionally anti-social,
and worthy of calling out publicly, but I must allow for the possibility
that my personal views on this may be antiquated and out of step with current
prevailing norms and attitudes.


Regards,
rfg


Current thread: