nanog mailing list archives
Re: irrd or ...?
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 15:35:56 -0300
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 3:22 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
At least 32GB RAM
It runs fine now with 16GB RAM, after a code change. It will also take much less RAM if you turn RPKI validation off. This is from TC at this moment, which mirrors 5.5 million records from other IRRs and do RPKI validation of its own objects: free -g total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 31 12 5 6 13 11 Swap: 3 0 3
At least 4 CPU cores
We run with 2 CPU cores, and indeed you might want to use 3 or 4: top - 18:27:59 up 4:24, 1 user, load average: 2.24, 2.19, 3.04
At least 150GB of disk space (SSD recommended)
Possibly less than that, we provisioned 100GB and it uses half of it. The host system indeed uses SSD, but it hosts many more VMs. An iostat of the VM as of now: avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 21.59 0.00 2.97 0.43 0.00 75.01 Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd (...) sda 135.40 1356.78 3650.10 0.00 21898122 58912032 0 Rubens
Current thread:
- irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 19)
- Re: irrd or ...? Job Snijders via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: irrd or ...? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jun 20)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)