nanog mailing list archives
Re: irrd or ...?
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 14:51:48 -0300
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 2:37 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
i have been running irrd for some years. am about to dump that (virtual) server and move from freebsd to bullseye. is there anything more modern, and _simpler_, than irrd at which i should take a look?
While IRRd4 fails the simpler criteria, it passes the more modern criteria of your question. And since both irrd-legacy and RWS (RIPE) seem to not be maintained, I believe it to be the only code that can be labeled as modern. What I can say from the experience of running TC IRR (32k objects) is that you need lots of RAM and vCPUs, much more than IRRd 2.9/3.x. https://github.com/irrdnet/irrd Rubens
Current thread:
- irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 19)
- Re: irrd or ...? Job Snijders via NANOG (Jun 20)
- Re: irrd or ...? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jun 20)
- Re: irrd or ...? Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- Re: irrd or ...? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 18)