Re: VPN recommendations?

[Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>]

We use SonicWall TZ series for just this purpose. The IPSec VPN endpoints can be behind NAT, and we just use DYNDNS to 
map whatever is current to a FQDN. Each side thus has the public IP of the other side and can connect as long as you 
pass through GRE.

-mel via cell

On Feb 10, 2022, at 1:05 PM, Matt Harris <matt () netfire net> wrote:


[cid:image200517.png@6CD88F22.1B50C51A]
Matt Harris​
|
Infrastructure Lead
816‑256‑5446
|
Direct
Looking for help?
Helpdesk<https://help.netfire.net/>
|
Email Support<mailto:help () netfire net>
[https://netfire.net/Flag-United-States-of-America.jpg]
We build customized end‑to‑end technology solutions powered by NetFire Cloud.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:03 PM William Herrin <bill () herrin us<mailto:bill () herrin us>> wrote:
Hi folks,

Do you have any recommendations for VPN appliances? Specifically: I need to build a site to site VPNs at speeds between 
100mpbs and 1 gbit where all but one of the sites are behind an IPv4 NAT gateway with dynamic public IP addresses.

Normally I'd throw OpenVPN on a couple of Linux boxes and be happy but my customer insists on a network appliance. Site 
to site VPNs using IPSec and static IP addresses on the plaintext side are a dime a dozen but traversing NAT and 
dynamic IP addresses (and automatically re-establishing when the service goes out and comes back up with different 
addresses) is a hard requirement.

For OpenVPN, I like the Netgate boxes running pfsense. Works great, super easy integrations with stuff like 
AC/LDAP/radius/etc for auth, frr and others for your routing, etc. This is probably your best bet.

For IPSec I tend to stick to Juniper SRX boxes.

Good luck!