nanog mailing list archives
Re: VPN recommendations?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:53:25 -0800
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:06 AM Guillaume Tournat <guillaume () ironie org> wrote:
Fortinet firewalls (FortiGate) are a great deal
Thanks Guillaume, I found this https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-IPsec-VPN-between-static-and-dynamic-IP-FQDN/ta-p/191815 but it suggests that the dynamic IP fortigate expects to have a public dynamic IP directly on the Fortigate, not be stuck behind a NAT. Are you aware of any documentation that describes: LAN - Fortigate - NAT (dynaimic IP) - Internet - (static IP) Fortigate - LAN Where the Meraki is responsible for keeping the NAT translations alive without any programming on the NAT? Regards, Bill -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: VPN recommendations?, (continued)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Keith Stokes (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Shawn L via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mark Wiater (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Dave Taht (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Phineas Walton (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Shawn L via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Tom Beecher (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Sabri Berisha (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Bjørn Mork (Feb 11)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Keith Stokes (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mark Wiater (Feb 10)
- Re: VPN recommendations? Mel Beckman (Feb 10)
- RE: VPN recommendations? Ryland Kremeier (Feb 10)