nanog mailing list archives

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse


From: Hunter Fuller via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:09:14 -0500

Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragraph.

But once we know that they do, in fact, filter messages, we can
understand why it might *seem* like they filter based on political
content.
For example, if a left-leaning news outlet uses bit.ly URLs, and a
right-leaning one uses goo.gl URLs, and T-Mo filters all goo.gl URLs,
some might conclude that "T-Mobile filters links to right-leaning news
outlets."

--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:06 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:

Spam filtering is clearly not the accusation that was laid out.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:48 AM Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog () uah edu> wrote:

I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile
filters messages based on content.

https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-receive-texts-that-contain-goo-gl-7776

Now, there is no indication I'm aware of, that it is political in
nature. But they do, factually, throw away messages based on their
content.

--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:46 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:

It's a pretty serious claim to say that cell providers were selectively not delivering messages based on content.

Unless you have some more concrete evidence beyond "I sent a few texts" , this list is no place for such things, 
nor the insinuation of political agendas.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:54 AM Ethan O'Toole <telmnstr () 757 org> wrote:

They may tell you they are not but there is no doubt in my mind they are and
if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”.
-richey

During Covid hysteria cellular carriers were definitly scrubbing text
messages that contained things against whatever the agenda was.

There was no errors from the cellular carriers that the message didn't go
through, it just never arrived to the destination. Tested it first hand,
T-Mobile to Verizon, T-Mobile to AT&T and vice versa. Payload was links to
a few websites that weren't popular with the left, like that Doctor Robert
Malone guy. These were not using URL shorteners that are sometimes
considered spam.


                        - Ethan


Current thread: