nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rack rails on network equipment
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:35:02 +0200
* cma () cmadams net (Chris Adams) [Sat 25 Sep 2021, 00:17 CEST]:
Which - why do I have to order different part numbers for back to front airflow? It's just a fan, can't it be made reversible? Seems like that would be cheaper than stocking alternate part numbers.
The fan is inside the power supply right next to the high-voltage capacitors. You shouldn't be near that without proper training.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- Rack rails on network equipment Andrey Khomyakov (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Mel Beckman (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Alain Hebert (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Brandon Butterworth (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Denis Fondras (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Martin Hannigan (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Niels Bakker (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Bryan Fields (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Chris Adams (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Sabri Berisha (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Randy Carpenter (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Lady Benjamin Cannon (Sep 26)