nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:41:54 +0200
tor. 23. sep. 2021 01.39 skrev Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com>:
Where does this "You can only have about 200-300 subscribers per IPv4 address on a CGN." limit come from? I have seen several apartment complexes run on a single static IPv4 address using a Mikrotik with NAT.
It is our observation as the limit before you regularly run out of ports using Linux as a CGN server. It will still work if you have more users on an IP. The users will just experience session failures at peak. Low levels of that might show up as pictures that fail to load on a web page and be ok when the user reloads. This will increase the number of support calls and the number of customers that asks to escape the CGN. Or people will live with it and just think that the Internet connection is low quality. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Colton Conor (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Colton Conor (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eric Kuhnke (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 23)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 23)