Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

[Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 05:17 , Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/13/21 01:00, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> > If vendors actually cared they could make the CGNAT's and other hacks ridiculously buggy and really expensive to 
> > deploy and maintain. I doubt many vendors were chomping at the bit to support CGNAT and are probably wondering what 
> > fresh hell is next to keep ipv4 limping along.
>
> 10's of millions of dollars being spent by African mobile operators, every year, in CG-NAT hardware and licenses, 
> with the vendors.
>
> They will make sure that code is bug-free :-).

ROFLMAO

100s of millions of dollars are spent every year on major backbone router kit. That code has never been bug free.

Your assertion is provably false.

Owen