nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv4 on mobile networks
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:50:09 +0200
On 10/25/21 18:12, Masataka Ohta wrote:
So are IP entities behind NAT. So?
I still don't understand your point. Are you asserting that NAT'ed devices do not have an IP address? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks, (continued)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Ca By (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Michael Thomas (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Masataka Ohta (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Ca By (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Masataka Ohta (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Masataka Ohta (Oct 25)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 25)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Gustav Ulander (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Bryan Fields (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 25)