nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv4 on mobile networks
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:35:22 +0900
Ca By wrote:
I do not believe it is either technically nor economically feasible to run a 4g or 5g network without an ip address on the ue.
So are IP entities behind NAT. So?
Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: . (was IPv6 and CDN's), (continued)
- Re: . (was IPv6 and CDN's) Fred Baker (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Ca By (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Brian Johnson (Oct 23)
- ipv4 on mobile networks Michael Thomas (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Ca By (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Michael Thomas (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Masataka Ohta (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Ca By (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Masataka Ohta (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Masataka Ohta (Oct 25)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 25)
- Re: ipv4 on mobile networks Mark Tinka (Oct 24)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Gustav Ulander (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Bryan Fields (Oct 23)