nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper hardware recommendation
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 06:42:09 +0200
On 5/10/21 20:22, aaron1 () gvtc com wrote:
Thanks Mark. We have a ring of MX960’s currently and wanted to spare the parts with each other, between the 960’s and 240’s…. scb’s, re’s, mpc’s…
Ah, makes sense in that case, then. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation, (continued)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Marco Paesani (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 09)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation aaron1 (May 10)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Adam Thompson (May 14)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Jason Healy (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Colton Conor (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Jon Lewis (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 15)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Saku Ytti (May 15)