nanog mailing list archives

RE: Juniper hardware recommendation

From: <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 13:22:20 -0500

Thanks Mark.  We have a ring of MX960’s currently and wanted to spare the parts with each other, between the 960’s and 
240’s…. scb’s, re’s, mpc’s…

 

-Aaron

Current thread:

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation, (continued)
- - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Alain Hebert (May 07)
  - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Marco Paesani (May 08)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 09)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation aaron1 (May 10)
  - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
    - RE: Juniper hardware recommendation aaron1 (May 10)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
  - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Michael Fiumano (May 14)
  - RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Adam Thompson (May 14)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Jason Healy (May 16)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Colton Conor (May 16)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 16)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Jon Lewis (May 16)
  - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Saku Ytti (May 15)
    - Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 15)

(Thread continues...)