nanog mailing list archives

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections


From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 11:25:35 +0200

In 2021 I would claim that 100 Mbps is where "good" internet starts. Yes,
25 Mbps will work but it is not good internet. Not to mention 2 Mbps ADSL
which is almost the same as no internet.

Now there are needs for an individual and there are needs for a community.
The rural communities have a genuine need for good internet. Anything less
will continue to accelerate the move of people to the cities. In the end,
each individual decides for himself what his needs are and sufficient
people want good internet, so that they will have that as part of their
considerations when deciding to move.

With poor internet the community will accumulate people that dont care
about the internet, which often means elderly people. More elderly people
means younger people do not feel at home, so they will move away or not
move there, which further accelerates the effect.

Regards,

Baldur


On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:19 PM Andy Ringsmuth <andy () andyring com> wrote:

Well, honestly, if you really want to go down the “need vs. want” road,
100 percent of the folks on this list would be out of a job.

What are genuine needs? Food/water, clothing and shelter. That’s it. Even
the last two are somewhat negotiable if you get right down to it.

----
Andy Ringsmuth
5609 Harding Drive
Lincoln, NE 68521-5831
(402) 304-0083
andy () andyring com

“Better even die free, than to live slaves.” - Frederick Douglas, 1863

On May 29, 2021, at 7:48 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

Need vs. want.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com

From: "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
To: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 3:49:01 AM
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

I am in Europe / Denmark. The EU has defined broadband to be 100 Mbps
download with nothing specified for upload. The goal is for everyone to
have access to broadband by 2025.

Such definitions do help those in rural areas. In fact this is precisely
useful for those that do not currently have access. It helps to make goals
and to measure how we are progressing.

All current technologies can deliver broadband, including DSL, coax, 5G
and fixed wireless. But maybe not without investment. That DSL plant might
need upgrading to the latest VDSL and cabinets closer to the customer. The
coax might need upgrades etc. But that is the point. Providers will need to
invest to be able to claim broadband.

On the other hand a soft easy broadband definition is useless in my
opinion. Then everyone has broadband, hurray, but many have slow internet
and nothing is going to be done because it is broadband!

Regards

Baldur



Current thread: