nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone?
From: Tarko Tikan <tarko () lanparty ee>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:25:14 +0300
hey,
I did an L3VPN over SRv6 test recently using IS-IS as the IGP. I thought it was quite cool that I didn't configure any IPv6 addressing at all in the core... simply enabled v6 on interfaces and allowed FE80 LL's to run... IS-IS neighbored up... then added a mp-ibgp v6 loopback (rfc 4193) to the PE's and let BGP neighbor up... L3VPN worked over SRv6 (of course with all that weird (new) locator magic).
For less adventurous - you can also do unnumbered ISIS or OSPF. It works equally as good and enables one to do plug-and-play SR-MPLS like you would do layer-2 network.
-- tarko
Current thread:
- IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Adam Thompson (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Mark Tinka (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Saku Ytti (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Adam Thompson (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Saku Ytti (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Adam Thompson (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Saku Ytti (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Mark Tinka (May 04)
- RE: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? aaron1 (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Tarko Tikan (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? William Allen Simpson (May 05)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Saku Ytti (May 04)
- RE: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Adam Thompson (May 04)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Mark Tinka (May 05)
- Re: IS-IS and IPv6 LLA next-hop - just Arista, or everyone? Mark Tinka (May 04)