nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: John Covici <covici () ccs covici com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:06:08 -0400
Absolutely. I hate those web based forums, they force me to do all kinds of things that Email lists don't force me to do and the interfaces between them are often clunky or don't work. Keep it simple, please. On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:41:22 -0400, Shawn L via NANOG wrote:
[1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>] Agreed. Don't fix what isn't broken. -----Original Message----- From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm To: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com>, "Rod Beck" <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote:i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic. in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not need to fix that.Simple. As. That. Mark. [2 <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
-- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una covici () ccs covici com
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Sabri Berisha (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Alain Hebert (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Tom Beecher (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Shawn L via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Randy Bush (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? John Covici (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Joly MacFie (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 22)