nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: j k <jsklein () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:58:23 -0500
My question becomes, what level of risk are these companies taking on by using the DoD ranges on their internal networks? And have they quantified the costs of this outage against moving to IPv6? Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been." -- *Wayne Gretzky "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:06 AM John Curran <jcurran () istaff org> wrote:
Indeed. /JohnOn Jan 20, 2021, at 8:47 AM, Cynthia Revström <me () cynthia re> wrote: But if you do this, make sure you keep track of where you might have putpolicies like this in, in case the DoD sells some the space or whatever in the future.
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Cynthia Revström via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space j k (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Martin (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Dorn Hetzel (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Martin (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jim Young via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Fred Baker (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Andy Ringsmuth (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Svec (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Cynthia Revström via NANOG (Jan 20)