nanog mailing list archives
RE: Suspicious IP reporting
From: Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:22:04 -0500
I do not know Tom personally, but I’ve been following his comments, hindsight and shared experience. Tom seems to be a bigger player than you on this mailing list. Joe, you are only penalizing yourself by banning him. I would personally not ban him. J From: Jean St-Laurent <jean () ddostest me> Sent: February 4, 2021 6:28 PM To: 'JoeSox' <joesox () gmail com>; 'Tom Beecher' <beecher () beecher cc> Cc: 'NANOG' <nanog () nanog org> Subject: RE: Suspicious IP reporting So what? I’ve scanned the internet more than 100’ times on all ports/protocols than you can imagine with zmap and many other shabby tools. I agree with Tom that these absue reports are totally useless and create so much noise that it feels like crying wolf. Network operator are trained to absorb and protect against that. Are you aware of the 4D rules? Dether Denied Detect Delay Unless that you are a real threat to a nation… good luck. There is a new submarine link that connect America with Europe. It is said to be 250 Tbps. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/googles-dunant-subsea-cable-is-now-ready-for-service Kill this link and I guess the industry will listen to you. Good luck with your ip in China. Jean St-Laurent From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org <mailto:nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> > On Behalf Of JoeSox Sent: February 4, 2021 6:06 PM To: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc <mailto:beecher () beecher cc> > Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org> > Subject: Re: Suspicious IP reporting Tom, Others are seeing it as I provided the website that shows others are seeing it. https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/79.124.62.86 I think it is pretty poor form to be ignorant. Congrats you have been banned from my gmail account straight to the deleted. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:12 PM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc <mailto:beecher () beecher cc> > wrote: I think it's pretty poor form to ask people to report an IP for doing something they are not seeing themselves, and may not even be abuse. What does "hitting devices" mean? Pings? SNMP? This sort of thing contributes to abuse reponses being poor; lots of noise, not much signal. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:22 PM JoeSox <joesox () gmail com <mailto:joesox () gmail com> > wrote: This IP is hitting devices on cellular networks for the past day or so. https://www.abuseipdb.com/whois/79.124.62.86 I think this is the info to report it to the ISP. Any help or if everyone can report it, I would be a happy camper. abuse () 4cloud mobi <mailto:abuse () 4cloud mobi> ; abuse () fiberinternet bg <mailto:abuse () fiberinternet bg> https://en.asytech.cn/check-ip/79.124.62.25#gsc.tab=0 -- Thank You, Joe
Current thread:
- Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting Tom Beecher (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- RE: Suspicious IP reporting Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Feb 04)
- RE: Suspicious IP reporting Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting Tom Beecher (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting TJ Trout (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- RE: Suspicious IP reporting Ryan Hamel (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- RE: Suspicious IP reporting Ryan Hamel (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting Dave Phelps (Feb 04)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting Joe (Feb 05)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 05)
- Re: Suspicious IP reporting JoeSox (Feb 04)