nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: scott <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:56:09 -1000
--- sabri () cluecentral net wrote: From: Sabri Berisha <sabri () cluecentral net>The true enemy here is mid-level management that refuses to prioritize deployment of IPv6.
What we should be discussing is how best to approach that problem. It's where ops and corporate politics overlap.
----------------------------------------------100% agreed! Been whining about that here many times. I have been trying to get IPv6 going for a long time, but the above stopped my plans. One thing I mentioned recently, though, is we just got a $BIGCUSTOMER and their requirement was we do IPv6. So keep your IPv6 deployment plans ready. In my case they said a 'we need it right now' kind of thing. That could happen to anyone here.
scott
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Fred Baker (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space scott (Feb 13)
- RE: DoD IP Space Mark Foster (Feb 13)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 14)