nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Izaac <izaac () setec org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:12:14 -0500
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:38:00AM -0800, William Herrin wrote:
None whatsoever. You just have to be really big.
Hi Beel, Thanks for backing me up with an example of an organization with competent network engineering. Their ability to almost infinitely leverage the existing rfc1918 address space to serve an appreciable fraction of all Internet attached hosts is a real demonstration of the possible. Since relay, -- . ___ ___ . . ___ . \ / |\ |\ \ . _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Gary Buhrmaster (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space bzs (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Eric Kuhnke (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Fred Baker (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space scott (Feb 13)
- RE: DoD IP Space Mark Foster (Feb 13)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 14)