nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:12:53 -0700
On 4/24/21 3:45 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Is this to say that the prefixes are now being announced? Sorry for this dumb question, but how would this honeypot work?On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 8:26 AM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:This doesn’t sound good, no matter how you slice it. The lack of transparency with a civilian resource is troubling at a minimum.You do understand that the addresses in question are not and have never been "civilian." They came into DoD's possession when this was all still a military project funded by what's now DARPA. Personally, I think we may have an all time record for the largest honeypot ever constructed. I'd love to be a fly on that wall.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 27)
- RE: DoD IP Space Ryan Hamel (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 26)
- RE: DoD IP Space Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Apr 26)
- RE: DoD IP Space Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Michael Thomas (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bill Woodcock (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)