nanog mailing list archives

Re: OOB management options @ 60 Hudson & 1 Summer


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:56:33 -0500 (CDT)

*nods* band support, where the directional antenna is pointing, etc. 




cellmapper.com has a good map of tower locations, sector coverage, etc. If you have an Android device, you can 
contribute to the crowd-sourcing. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuhnke () gmail com> 
To: "Matthew Crocker" <matthew () corp crocker com> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 8:08:55 PM 
Subject: Re: OOB management options @ 60 Hudson & 1 Summer 



Before getting rid of the cellular based OOB, look into some more detail about exactly what LTE modems are in those. 
I've seen some remarkable results from equipment using the 600/700 bands (tmobile, verizon) for getting signal into 
deeply buried concrete structures. There's a lot of different types and capabilities of cellular data modems on the 
market. 








On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:15 PM Matthew Crocker < matthew () corp crocker com > wrote: 






I have routers in both 60 Hudson St & 1 Summer St and I’m looking for some low cost bandwidth options for out of band 
management. Currently I have Opengear boxes at each site with cell modems but they don’t work too well. I either need 
to replace them with new cell based devices or find a wireless/ethernet bandwidth option. I only need a couple serial 
ports and ethernet for when everything breaks. 

I’m in DR space @ 60 Hudson and the Markeley MMR @ 1 Summer 

I’m surprised OOB bandwidth isn’t a feature for colocation providers. 

Thanks 




Current thread: