Re: antispamcloud.com (SpamExperts) forensics reports format

[John Levine via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

In article <120a24d4e0da4f2392a25a8140be2a9d () ex1 obs.local> you write:
> We are parsing dmarc reports using parsedmarc and the forensics reports coming from antispamcloud.com seems not to
> follow the recommended reporting format (AFRF) and therefore are considered invalid.

You're right, they're not following the DMARC spec that says the reports
are sent in multipart/report ARF format.

Followups to the mailop list, where people who know about this stuff
are likely to read them.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly