nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'


From: Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 06:28:48 +0200



On 8/Sep/20 22:02, Tom Beecher via NANOG wrote:

I also get that intent from the OP. However I disagree that there
should be a 'de facto' standard created for such things. All flavors
of BGP community specifications are designed to be flexible so that
different networks can design a system that is tailored to their needs. 

Having 'de facto' standards does not simplify in my opinion. I
believe it just creates more work for operators trying to navigate
around different opinions of what 'de facto' means.

Indeed.

Consider a new ISP starting operations in Myanmar, with little or no
global peering, having to wade through tons of information to design
their BGP community structure based on a "de facto" standard defined by
a group of ISP's half-way around the world.

What's the real value?

Mark.


Current thread: