nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:44:23 -0400
Yeah, it changes.They started with FreeBSD 4.x + their patches, then moved it inside a hardened Linux for virtualization functions (watch closely the boot sequence).
uname returns MX960 - FreeBSD amd64 QFX 5100 - JUNOS i386 (build tag show indication its FreeBSD still) ----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 2020-10-08 18:50, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:55 AM, <aaron1 () gvtc com> <aaron1 () gvtc com> wrote: JunOS is so linux basedUm, my MX-204 says FreeBSD amd64.
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP, (continued)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Casey Russell via NANOG (Oct 08)
- RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP aaron1 (Oct 08)
- RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP aaron1 (Oct 08)
- RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP aaron1 (Oct 08)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Chris Boyd (Oct 08)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Matt Harris (Oct 08)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Ryan Hamel (Oct 08)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Chris Adams (Oct 08)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP David Kotlerewsky (Oct 09)
- RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP aaron1 (Oct 08)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Alain Hebert (Oct 09)
- Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Eric Kuhnke (Oct 09)
- RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP aaron1 (Oct 10)
- RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP aaron1 (Oct 08)