Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

[Casey Deccio <casey () deccio net>]

> On Oct 14, 2020, at 3:34 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com> wrote:
>
> I think he means packet captures from an example, voluntarily-tested recursive nameserver subject to this attack.


Thanks.  We have updated all the report pages with a self-test tool specific to the network associated with the report. 
 This should allow a network admin that received our report to check whether or not the condition still exists and to 
perform a packet capture from whatever vantage point they want in their network.

A more general tool (i.e., for anyone to use) will be made available in the future.

Cheers,
Casey

> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:53 AM Casey Deccio <casey () deccio net <mailto:casey () deccio net>> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> > On Oct 14, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net <mailto:bryan () shout net>> wrote:
> >
> > I too would like to know more about their methodology
>
> We've written up our methodology and results in a paper that will be available in a few weeks.  Happy to post it here 
> if folks are interested.  Obviously, no networks are individually identified; it's all aggregate.
>
> Also, we're working on a self-test tool, but it's not quite ready yet.  Sorry.
>
> > and actual tangibles ideally in the form of PCAPs.
>
> What do you mean by "tangibles in the form of PCAPs"?
>
> Casey