nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939
From: "Kaiser, Erich" <erich () gotfusion net>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:30:46 -0500
Depending on peer traffic, it may make more sense to co-locate a switch at a DC and then bring in some PNIs from your top usage peers. Check your peer usage using something like AS-Stats. Your top usage peers are going to be your most costly expense in the end... Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network erich () gotfusion net Office: 815-570-3101 On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:19 AM Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
On Oct 13, 2020, at 7:29 PM, Aaron Gould <aaron1 () gvtc com> wrote: Do y’all like HE for Internet uplink? I’m thinking about using them for100gig in Texas. It would be for my eyeballs ISP. We currently have Spectrum, Telia and Cogent. No. Too many problems with scenic routing due to lack of BGP communities to control route advertisements. Also the usual lack of full table issue due to route suppression on their transits based on AFI. I’m sure it works well for many people, but if you are large enough you need to do any form of TE the lack of BGP communities is a major issue. - Jared
Current thread:
- RE: Hurricane Electric AS6939, (continued)
- RE: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Luke Guillory (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Oct 15)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Eric Kuhnke (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Mike Hammett (Oct 14)
- RE: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Michael Spears (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Darin Steffl (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Mike Hammett (Oct 14)
- RE: Hurricane Electric AS6939 [EXTERNAL] Romeo Czumbil (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Clayton Zekelman (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Jared Mauch (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Kaiser, Erich (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Baldur Norddahl (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 Mike Hammett (Oct 14)
- Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939 John Kristoff (Oct 13)