nanog mailing list archives
Technology risk without safeguards
From: Suresh Kalkunte <sskalkunte () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:06:54 +0530
To me, this discussion is as good that could come out of a Congressional Committee proceeding. Ie., empower and deliberate on the substantiveness of a subject that affects the unsuspecting and defenseless.
raw garlic assimilationThis thread is definitely going to be used in a future court case
Is there scope for misunderstanding my experiences to overcome superior adversity? consider viewing competitionunlimited.wordpress.com/exposure- scenarios, a page I authored after the discussion on controlled vs. un-controlled exposure. On Tuesday, November 10, 2020, Jon Sands <fohdeesha () gmail com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 8:00 PM Suresh Kalkunte <sskalkunte () gmail com> wrote:raw garlic assimilationThis thread is definitely going to be used in a future court case
Current thread:
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards, (continued)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Max Harmony (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Tom Beecher (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Rich Kulawiec (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 06)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Jon Sands (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)