nanog mailing list archives
Re: Technology risk without safeguards
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:59:24 -0500
/Friday afternoon On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 09:05:34AM -0800, William Herrin wrote:
Following staff home and picking them off with a rifle is so much cheaper and carries a better probability of success.
So does following them home and leaving them brand new unopened large bottles of Woodford Reserve. I highly recommend this approach for anyone who has selected me as a target and promise that I will duly report on its progressive deleterious effects. For accuracy, repeated trials over an extended period of time may be necessary but this is an ordeal I'm selflessly prepared to undertake for the sake of science. ---rsk p.s.1: I've worked in high-energy EM environments twice, in two different contexts. The safety measures were thorough and rigorous: it would have been very hard to screw up and even if any of us had, the inverse-square law would probably have saved us from serious harm. p.s.2: The large quantities of power conduits, cables, shelving, racks, HVAC ductwork, etc. that are typical of datacenters constitute a haphazard but modestly effective EM shield, as measured on an ad hoc basis by anyone who tries to receive external signals inside them (even when everything is powered down) will quickly discover. Thus an attempt to pull off a movie villain-grade underground attack designed to fry a staff member would likely require that the victim stand still on a selected spot (on the lowest-level floor) with a minimal amount of metal under it. I recommend that prospective attackers use the Wile E. Coyote (Sooper Genius) methodology, draw a large X on that spot, and install a sign that says "Free Birdseed". I'm certain this will work.
Current thread:
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards, (continued)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards nanog08 (Nov 04)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Max Harmony (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 04)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Tom Beecher (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Rich Kulawiec (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards William Herrin (Nov 06)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 06)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Jon Sands (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 10)
- Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 10)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Sabri Berisha (Nov 05)
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Technology risk without safeguards Suresh Kalkunte (Nov 05)