nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rogue BGP Routes


From: Gary Godard via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 14:14:54 -0500

We had an eBGP session with them at that time but it was very problematic.
It is strange that the IP blocks that had the issue were the same blocks
that we advertised with them and the ones that we were using with Level 3
at the time were unaffected.

Once this message posted to the group, I got responses from Charter almost
immediately from the group. So if I had been a member of the group
yesterday morning when the problem was discovered I could have had a much
faster resolution.

Thanks for the response.

Gary Godard
*Chief Technical Officer*


             308 Pine Street
       West Monroe, LA 71291

Office: 800-536-7035 x5201        Fax:   888-471-8778
Direct: 318-884-9422
Email: gary () skyrider net     Web: www.skyrider.net
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-godard-48733920

----------------------------------------------------
Matt 4:19
And he saith unto them, "Follow me,
  and I will make you fishers of men."

If you are his follower, "A Christian",
      where are you fishing???
----------------------------------------------------

This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings
are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and destroy the
communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any
action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by
anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited



On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:16 PM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:



On 15/May/20 19:13, Gary Godard wrote:


We did previously have a relationship with 10 years ago in the
Thibodaux/Hammond area.

Do you recall whether you had an eBGP session with them, or if they
originated your prefixes on your behalf behind their own AS?



Not sure who resolved the issue or if RPKI that I set up yesterday
afternoon was responsible. but it does not appear to be an issue at
this time.

RPKI is not yet that widely deployed that you would see global success
in resolution. I'm curious to understand my query above...

That said, do keep trying to find a warm body there that can answer your
questions.

Mark.


Current thread: