nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rogue BGP Routes
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 19:16:02 +0200
On 15/May/20 19:13, Gary Godard wrote:
We did previously have a relationship with 10 years ago in the Thibodaux/Hammond area.
Do you recall whether you had an eBGP session with them, or if they originated your prefixes on your behalf behind their own AS?
Not sure who resolved the issue or if RPKI that I set up yesterday afternoon was responsible. but it does not appear to be an issue at this time.
RPKI is not yet that widely deployed that you would see global success in resolution. I'm curious to understand my query above... That said, do keep trying to find a warm body there that can answer your questions. Mark.
Current thread:
- Rogue BGP Routes Gary Godard via NANOG (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Christopher Morrow (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Seth Mattinen (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Mark Tinka (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Gary Godard via NANOG (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Mark Tinka (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Gary Godard via NANOG (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Mark Tinka (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Gary Godard via NANOG (May 15)
- Re: Rogue BGP Routes Christopher Morrow (May 15)