nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDP/123 policers & status
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:13:18 +0200
On 17/Mar/20 16:53, Jared Mauch wrote:
Should we be looking to remove these, similar to how we did for SQL/Slammer after a time?
FWIW, we've never policed udp/123 on our end. We haven't seen anything untoward. Mark.
Current thread:
- UDP/123 policers & status Jared Mauch (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Compton, Rich A (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ca By (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Steven Sommars (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ca By (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Damian Menscher via NANOG (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Damian Menscher via NANOG (Mar 18)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ca By (Mar 17)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Steven Sommars (Mar 19)