nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:09:38 +0200
On 29/Jul/20 15:51, Simon Leinen wrote:
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd sw-o(swp16) 4 65108 953559 938348 0 0 0 03w5d00h 688 sw-m(swp18) 4 65108 885442 938348 0 0 0 03w5d00h 688 s0001(swp1s0.3) 4 65300 748971 748977 0 0 0 03w5d00h 1 s0002(swp1s1.3) 4 65300 661787 661794 0 0 0 03w1d23h 1 s0003(swp1s2.3) 4 65300 748970 748977 0 0 0 03w5d00h 1 s0004(swp1s3.3) 4 65300 661868 661875 0 0 0 03w1d23h 1 s0005(swp2s0.3) 4 65300 748970 748976 0 0 0 03w5d00h 1 [...] Note the host names/interface names - this is how you generally refer to neighbors, rather than using literal (IPv6) addresses.
Are the names based on DNS look-ups, or is there some kind of protocol association between the device underlay and its hostname, as it pertains to neighbors? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists?, (continued)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Vincent Bernat (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Saku Ytti (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Douglas Fischer (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Chriztoffer Hansen (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Nick Hilliard (Jul 29)
- Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists? Mark Tinka (Jul 29)