Re: RFC 5549 - IPv4 Routes with IPv6 next-hop - Does it really exists?

[Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>]

On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 10:03, Vincent Bernat <bernat () luffy cx> wrote:

> This is the solution Cumulus is advocating to its users, so I suppose
> they have some real users behind that. Juniper also supports RFC 5549
> but, from the documentation, the forwarding part is done using
> lightweight tunnels.

I'm not sure if you claim otherwise, but no real 'tunneling' takes
place, as far as I know, it's internal implementation detail having
IPV6 next-hop for IPV4. I don't think there is any additional headers
or any additional lookup or cost.
Cisco supports extended nexthop encoding too, so it is fairly well
supported by shipping products.


-- 
  ++ytti