nanog mailing list archives
Re: cloud backup
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:58:03 +0200
On 26/Jul/20 23:44, John Sage wrote:
That awkward moment when someone apparently thinks that the author of: A Basic FidoNet(r) Technical Standard Revision 16 by Randy Bush, Pacific Systems Group September 30, 1995 is... ...what was the word? A "newbie"? hmm...
The Internet is always the Internet. What others do with it for it to add value to lives is a different thing. Almost everyone can offer something as simple as a web-based e-mail service. There aren't many companies that can offer a decent cloud backup solution, for the price. Much in the same way we discuss the limited number of VoD service providers on this list, for one reason or another. Or equipment vendors. Or CDN providers. Or... The Internet is pointless if we don't derive some utility from it. That that utility is given a product name should not be seen as evil, until that company comes on here to market it themselves, of course. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: cloud backup, (continued)
- Re: cloud backup Nick Hilliard (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- RE: cloud backup Tony Wicks (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Dovid Bender (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup John Sage (Jul 26)
- RE: cloud backup Tony Wicks (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Randy Bush (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Eric Tykwinski (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Mark Tinka (Jul 27)
- Re: cloud backup Nick Hilliard (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Mark Tinka (Jul 27)
- Re: cloud backup Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Mark Tinka (Jul 27)
- Re: cloud backup Randy Bush (Jul 27)