nanog mailing list archives
Re: cloud backup
From: Rob Szarka <szlists () szarka org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:52:43 -0400
On 2020-07-26 16:39, Michael Thomas wrote:
The other issue with Glacier is that you have to keep old versions around for (IIRC) 6 months to avoid being charged extra, which can really add up for weekly backups or what-have-you.On 7/26/20 1:09 PM, Randy Bush wrote:i backup using arq on macos catalina. on two macs, i need maybe 3-4tb max. google seems to be $100/mo for 20tb (big jump from $100/yr for 2tb). backblaze b2 looks more like $20/mo for 4tb ($0.005/gb/mo). anyone else done a similar analysis?AWS S3 infrequent access is $40/month. If it's really archival backup AWS has glacier which is less than $20/month, but it's name gives you an idea of what it is.Mike
I'm looking at a switch from AWS to B2 myself. I use Backblaze's desktop product on a Windows machine and love it.
Another possibility for sync similar to Google Drive is Jottacloud. Haven't tried it myself, but it looks very competitive for personal stuff. https://www.jottacloud.com/en/
Rob -- Rob Szarka http://szarka.org/
Current thread:
- Re: cloud backup, (continued)
- Re: cloud backup Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- RE: cloud backup Tony Wicks (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Dovid Bender (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup John Sage (Jul 26)
- RE: cloud backup Tony Wicks (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Randy Bush (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Eric Tykwinski (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Mark Tinka (Jul 27)
- Re: cloud backup Mark Tinka (Jul 27)
- Re: cloud backup Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: cloud backup Mark Tinka (Jul 27)
- Re: cloud backup Randy Bush (Jul 27)