nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAP-T in production
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 14:23:06 +0200
On 25/Jul/20 03:24, Randy Bush wrote:
a great path. fork lift all cpe and cgn in the core. the vendors' dream
All major vendors are shipping IPv6. Some even 464XLAT. And yet they will not put those forward as long term solutions. As Randy points out, CG-NAT sells plenty in license fees. And you need more and more, every year. Not less. So, go ahead and enrich the vendors, at the expense of your business. And we shall all wonder why they keep saying "But no one is asking for IPv6". Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: MAP-T in production, (continued)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Tom Hill (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Mark Tinka (Jul 26)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 27)
- Re: MAP-T in production Baldur Norddahl (Jul 27)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)