nanog mailing list archives

Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16

From: Large Hadron Collider <large.hadron.collider () gmx com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:12:43 +0000

Could not have worded it better myself.

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:30:22 +0000
Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:

Then why are you sending email to nanog () nanog org?

LOL!

 -mel

On Jan 29, 2020, at 12:41 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg () tristatelogic com> wrote:

I have a standing policy of never attempting to converse with unaccountable
anonymized role accounts.  Based on past experience, this is without
exception an utter waste of my time.



--
Large Hadron Collider <large.hadron.collider () gmx com>

Current thread:

The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Ronald F. Guilmette (Jan 29)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Sabri Berisha (Jan 29)
  - Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Mike Bolitho (Jan 29)
- Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Mel Beckman (Jan 29)
  - Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16 Large Hadron Collider (Jan 30)