nanog mailing list archives

Re: The curious case of 159.174.0.0/16


From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:30:22 +0000

Then why are you sending email to nanog () nanog org?

LOL!

 -mel 

On Jan 29, 2020, at 12:41 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg () tristatelogic com> wrote:

I have a standing policy of never attempting to converse with unaccountable
anonymized role accounts.  Based on past experience, this is without
exception an utter waste of my time.


Current thread: