nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:56:59 -0500
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:07 PM Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> wrote:
On 1/17/20 02:13, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:From the web: the band 48 (3550-3700MHz) is for CBRS in US (Citizens' band broadband service; I suppose something like voice between trucks)CBRS (and the soon to be former NN band) doesn't have anything to do with CB radios.
cbrs is the 'overlaps with some navy usage' thing I think.. Oh yes according to networkworld: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3180615/faq-what-in-the-wireless-world-is-cbrs.html I think one target for this band was 'in building' LTE network usage.
Current thread:
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor, (continued)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 01)
- Message not available
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor sronan (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Alexandre Petrescu (Jan 15)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Alexandre Petrescu (Jan 16)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 16)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 16)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Alexandre Petrescu (Jan 17)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Seth Mattinen (Jan 17)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Jan 20)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Tom Beecher (Jan 17)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 18)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Alexandre Petrescu (Jan 18)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 16)