nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:58:30 +0200
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 10:53, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
5G is mostly about getting more unregulated data-related fees.Well, the kids don't want to pay for data. Heck, neither do I. On that basis alone, Any-G won't kill wi-fi :-).
Williams comment seems somewhat market specific and perhaps even overly negative. Mostly 5G is about better radio performance in dense metro installations, uninteresting metric for many markets. Some markets already do +20GB/month _average_ on 4G subscription with +50Mbps datarates, lower than DSL latency and <20EUR MRC. In these markets many opt not to have any other data connection but 4G, the benefits are compelling, cheaper, faster, lower latency, shorter MTTR and easier to switch to competition compared to DSL. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor, (continued)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Justin Oeder (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Ca By (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Saku Ytti (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Saku Ytti (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Jan 06)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor Ryland Kremeier (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Jan 03)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mike Hammett (Jan 03)