nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual Homed BGP
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:15:08 +0200
On 16/Feb/20 16:51, Saku Ytti wrote:
I'd really like to hear more datapoints from different eyeballs on this, like 60% local caches, of remaining traffic, 70% peered so transit = 0.4*0.3 = 12% I think this might be reasonable, but perhaps it's even less transit for eyeballs today?
So for us, we have quite a number of on-net caches, and the fill for them (or origin pull) is typically done via peering. Of the 85% we consider "peering traffic", around one-third of that is traffic from our on-net caches. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mike Hammett (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Kaiser, Erich (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Kaiser, Erich (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mike Hammett (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Dual Homed BGP adamv0025 (Feb 16)