nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual Homed BGP
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 16:51:12 +0200
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 14:02, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
But that only accounts for about 15% of our overall traffic. The rest comes from peering.
I'd really like to hear more datapoints from different eyeballs on this, like 60% local caches, of remaining traffic, 70% peered so transit = 0.4*0.3 = 12% I think this might be reasonable, but perhaps it's even less transit for eyeballs today? -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mike Hammett (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Kaiser, Erich (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Kaiser, Erich (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mike Hammett (Feb 16)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Dual Homed BGP adamv0025 (Feb 16)