Re: Ipv6 help

[Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us>]

I usually solve this problem by designing for NAT444 and dual-stack. This solves both problems and allows for users to 
migrate as they are able/need to. If you try and force the change, you will loose users.


> On Aug 25, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net> wrote:
>
> On 8/25/20 3:38 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> > This is very common in many countries and not related to IPv6, but because many operators have special configs or 
> > features in the CPEs they provide.
>
> I really, really hate to force users to use my network edge router (I provide the ONT, though, and I provide an edge 
> router that works and most users do take it), but it can be tough to ensure users have something that supports all 
> the right modern features and can be configured via standard means.
>
> It would be nice if the consumer router industry could get its collective act together and at least come up with some 
> easy-ish to understand feature support table that customers can match up with their service provider's list of needs. 
>  The status quo of a list of devices that work right (which is of course often staggeringly short if you're doing any 
> of these modern transition mechanisms) that needs constant updating and may not be easily available is not ideal.
>
> Heck just having a real, complete list of supported features on the model support page on their website would be an 
> improvement...
> -- 
> Brandon Martin